Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Outcomes in surgical and conservative treatment of symptomatic non-traumatic shoulder labrum tears in the paediatric population: a systematic review
  1. Kamaljeet Banga1,
  2. Muzammil Memon2,
  3. Louis-Phillipe Baisi3,
  4. Darren de SA3,
  5. Asheesh Bedi4,
  6. Olufemi R. Ayeni3
  1. 1 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Auburn Community Hospital, Auburn, New York, USA
  2. 2 Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University Medical Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University Medical Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Olufemi R. Ayeni, Dr. Olufemi R. Ayeni, McMaster University Medical Centre, 1200 Main St West, 4E15, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5; ayenif{at}mcmaster.ca

Abstract

Importance The glenoid labrum is an important static stabiliser of the glenohumeral joint. Consensus is lacking with regards to both conservative and surgical management options for non-traumatic labral tears in the paediatric population.

Objective The questions that this review aims to answer are as follows: (1) What are the treatment options available for non-traumatic glenoidlabrum tears in the paediatric population? and (2) What are the patient-important outcomes following non-operative and operative treatment modalities?

Evidence review In addition to published abstracts from 2011 to 2016 from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Arthroscopy Association of North America and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America , three electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE) were searched from inception to 19 January 2017 for studies on non-traumatic labral tears in the paediatric population. A systematic screen and data abstraction of titles, abstracts and full-text manuscripts were performed in duplicate, with descriptive statistics provided. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies was used to rate the quality of the included studies.

Findings Six studies from an initial 587 retrieved were included, and they examined 12 patients (12 shoulders) with median age of 17 years (range 11–18.6 years), 7 of which were males, who were followed for a median duration of 29.5 months (range 6–48 months). The most common location of the labrum tears was superior labrum anterior to posterior in six patients. Overall, 11 patients were managed arthroscopically, with the most common surgical technique being an isolated arthroscopic labrum debridement in five patients. Furthermore, 9 of the 11 patients treated surgically returned to sports, typically by 6–7 months postoperatively. Moreover, the single patient treated non-operatively also returned to sports and experienced significant improvements in the European Quality of Life measure, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and function score. There were no complications or revision procedures reported.

Conclusions and relevance In the paediatric population, literature investigating non-traumatic labral tears of the shoulder is scarce. However, based on the available data, patients are most frequently managed with arthroscopic labrum debridement. Furthermore, patients managed operatively and non-operatively experience good outcomes, including high rates of return to sports and no occurrence of complications and revision procedures.

Level of evidence Level IV.

  • Shoulder
  • Instability
  • Evidence based medicine

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors The conception and design of this research was completed by KB, MM, L-PB, DSA and ORA. The acquisition of data for this research was completed by KB, MM and L-PB. The analysis and interpretation of this research was completed by KB, MM and L-PB. The writing of the article for this research was completed by KB, MM and L-PB. The critical review of the article for this research was completed by KB, MM, L-PB, DSA, AB and ORA. The final approval for publication of this research was completed by KB, MM, L-PB, DSA, AB and ORA.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.