Article Text

other Versions

PDF
In-vivo pivot-shift test measured with inertial sensors correlates with the IKDC grade
  1. Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli1,
  2. Cecilia Signorelli2,
  3. Alberto Grassi1,
  4. Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina1,
  5. Federico Raggi1,
  6. Giuseppe Carbone1,
  7. Luca Macchiarola1,
  8. Vittorio Vaccari1,
  9. Stefano Zaffagnini1
    1. 1Clinica Ortopedica II, Lab. Biomeccanica, University of Bologna, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
    2. 2Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, NABI, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
    1. Correspondence to Dr Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Laboratorio di Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna 40100, Italy; marcheggianimuccioli{at}me.com

    Abstract

    Objectives Kinematic Rapid Assessment (KiRA) is a wireless, non-invasive, inertial system with a single tibial sensor developed to measure the pivot-shift (PS) test. The purpose of this study was to in-vivo compare acceleration values acquired by KiRA to the objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) clinical grading of PS. The comparison was performed in non-anaesthetised patients before and after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesised the existence of a correlation between the side-to-side difference in the measured acceleration range by KiRA and the objective IKDC clinical grading of the PS.

    Methods Between 2010 and 2014, 60 non-professional football players (male/female ratio: 42/18; mean age 34±15.4 years, range 14–51 years) with ACL lesion were enrolled. They underwent over-the-top ACL reconstruction plus lateral extra-articular plasty with autologous hamstrings. All the patients were evaluated before the reconstruction and re-evaluated at 12-month follow-up. Each patient underwent a clinical examination and then was subjected to the instrumental PS examination by KiRA. The difference in the acceleration range between injured/reconstructed and contralateral limb (Δarange) was used in the analysis. Correlations between Δarange values and objective IKDC clinical grades of PS were calculated using Spearman correlation analysis.

    Results All subjective scores improved from preoperative to follow-up (P≤0.01). Objective IKDC clinical grading of the PS improved from 4B, 40C and 16D to 50A, 8B and 2C (P<0.0001). The mean Δarange measured by KiRA improved from 2.0±1.0 to 0.2±0.4 m/s2 (P<0.0001). A very strong correlation was displayed between the overall Δarange measured by KiRA and overall objective IKDC clinical grading of the PS (r=0.86, P<0.0001); correlation was strong for preoperative data (r=0.71, P<0.0001) and moderate for postoperative data (r=0.53, P<0.0001). The mean Δarange resulted 0.3±0.3 m/s2 for the IKDC A subgroup, 0.8±0.3 m/s2 for the IKDC B subgroup, 1.7±0.8 m/s2 for the IKDC C subgroup and 2.9±0.9 m/s2 for the IKDC D subgroup.

    Conclusion The side-to-side difference in the measured acceleration range by KiRA shows a correlation with objective IKDC clinical grading of PS.

    Study design Case series; level of evidence: 4.

    • knee
    • anterior cruciate ligament
    • biomechanics
    • pivot-shift
    • inertial sensors
    • accelerometers.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Footnotes

    • Contributors This paper has more than five authors. They all contributed significantly to the article, writing different parts of the manuscript. Moreover, they also participated to the work as the team who performed all the surgeries that was composed of GMMM and SZ; the team who supervised the postoperative rehabilitation was composed of LM, GC and VV. GMMM performed patients’ clinical evaluations, TRDS and AG collected demographic data and outcome scores. CS and FR performed the data elaboration and statistical analysis.

    • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Ethics approval Approval of the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Collaborators Bragonzoni Laura, Rinaldi Vito Gaetano, Lullini Giada, Ferretti Emil.

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.