Importance Complex periarticular fractures of the knee can be difficult to reconstruct with osteosynthesis, can result in poor function and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality—particularly in the elderly. Primary acute total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical option which is rarely performed, but thought to have high rates of complication postoperatively.
Objective To investigate the literature regarding optimal patient selection for TKA after acute fracture with particular emphasis on postoperative outcomes and complications.
Evidence review A literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases using established methodology for conducting systematic reviews investigating acute TKA after trauma. Two reviewers screened citations using the methodological index for non-randomi zed studies score to determine inclusion, methodological quality assessment and data extraction.
Findings Eighteen papers met the inclusion criteria; totalling 284 acute arthroplasty procedures. The majority of cases were performed in elderly females and the most common fracture pattern was the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen type C. Inclusion criteria for acute arthroplasty—whether fracture or patient specific—was poorly defined. Modular, stemmed and highly constrained (condylar or hinged) prostheses were used. Complications were often seen including 44 deaths within 5 years of surgery and three instances of above knee amputation.
Conclusion and relevance Acute knee arthroplasty can be considered as primary management for an acute periarticular fracture in some cases, although patient selection is vital. These patients should also be viewed similar to fractured neck of femur patients and cared for appropriately.
Level of evidence 4.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors All three authors were involved in all four criteriae as per the ICMJE guidelines: substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.