Objective To evaluate the effect of arthroscopic release of the posterior capsuloligamentous structures on ankle dorsiflexion and function in patients with painful limitation of ankle dorsiflexion.
Methods A prospective consecutive case series of 13 adult patients with painful limitation of ankle dorsiflexion were included. None had clinically relevant gastrocnemius, soleus or Achilles contracture. Patients with anterior bony impingement or ankle degeneration on CT scan were excluded. All patients underwent combined anterior and posterior ankle arthroscopies with resection of posterior capsuloligamentous structures and the posterior fibulotalocalcaneal ligament. Ankle range of motion was assessed 2 years postoperatively. Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) were used to assess functional outcome.
Results The median patient age at surgery was 26 years (range 19–44). At 2 years postsurgery, the ankle dorsiflexion range had increased by 15 degrees (range 0–25, p<0.0001). FAOSs completed at a median of 44 months postsurgery (range 26–72) significantly improved. Median improvements were 19 points for pain (range 6–67, p=0.0004), 14 points for symptoms (range 0–36, p=0.0005), 15 points for activities of daily living (range 6–35, p<0.0001), 45 points for sport (range 20–55, p<0.0001) and 50 points for quality of life (range 13–62, p<0.0001).
Conclusions Hindfoot endoscopic release of the posterior ankle structures, including the posterior fibulotalocalcaneal ligament, is an effective technique for improving ankle dorsiflexion range in patients with painful limitation of ankle dorsiflexion.
Level of evidence IV.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors JC: data collection; BH: data analysis and paper writing; MD-P: review of the paper and provision of cadaveric dissection images; JK: review of the paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval Institutional review confirmed that formal ethics approval was not required as this study was an evaluation of service, and all patients were deidentified.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.