Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation: current concepts
  1. Benjamin B Rothrauff1,
  2. Eiji Kondo2,
  3. Rainer Siebold3,
  4. Joon Ho Wang4,
  5. Kyoung Ho Yoon5,
  6. Freddie H Fu1
  1. 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2 Centre for Sports Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
  3. 3 International Center for Hip-Knee-Foot Surgery, ATOS Hospital & University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  4. 4 Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
  5. 5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  1. Correspondence to Dr Freddie H Fu, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; ffu{at}


Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are a common knee injury, and anatomic ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is now the standard of care to restore knee stability. Nevertheless, re-tear rates exceeding 5% are commonly reported, with an even higher percentage of patients unable to achieve preinjury knee function. As the torn ACL remnant contains elements (eg, cells, blood vessels and mechanoreceptors) essential to ACL function, it has been hypothesised that ACLR with remnant preservation may improve graft remodelling, in turn more quickly and completely restoring ACL structure and function. In this Current Concepts review, we summarise the present understanding of ACLR with remnant preservation, which includes selective bundle reconstruction of partial (one-bundle) ACL tears and single- and double-bundle ACLR with minimal to partial debridement of the torn ACL stump. Reported benefits of remnant preservation include accelerated graft revascularisation and remodelling, improved proprioception, decreased bone tunnel enlargement, individualised anatomic bone tunnel placement, improved objective knee stability and early mechanical support (with selective bundle reconstruction) to healing tissues. However, clinical studies of ACLR with remnant preservation are heterogeneous in the description of remnant characteristics and surgical technique. Presently, there is insufficient evidence to support the superiority of ACLR with remnant preservation over the standard technique. Future studies should better describe the ACL tear pattern, remnant volume, remnant quality and surgical technique. Progress made in understanding and applying remnant preservation may inform, and be reciprocally guided by, ongoing research on ACL repair. The goal of research on ACLR with remnant preservation is not only to achieve anatomic structural restoration of the ACL but also to facilitate biologic healing and regeneration to ensure a more robust and functional graft.

  • arthroscopy
  • biologics
  • repair/reconstruction
View Full Text

Statistics from


  • Twitter @BenRothrauff

  • Contributors BBR contributed to the conception, drafting, revising, and final approval of the manuscript. EK, RS, KHY, JHW, FHF contributed to the conception, revising, and final approval of the manuscript. All authors attest to the accuracy and integrity of complete manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.